About Dada Collective Network

This is not a tech project. This is a justice project that uses tech.

Dada Collective Network is the digital foundation of a long-term trust ecosystem for women and girls in Kenya. We were built by the movement that filled the streets in January 2024. We exist because institutions failed, and the people in them did not build what was needed. So we are building it ourselves.

Why Dada exists

Kenya has documented 1,069 female murders since 2016. Of those, 842 meet the UNODC definition of femicide. The number that should stop you: zero have ever been legally classified as femicide. The crime does not exist in Kenyan statute.

The institutions that should respond — police, courts, prosecution, healthcare — all exist. The gauntlet a survivor faces is not produced by any single institution being absent. It is produced by the absence of connective tissue between them. She carries the file. She retells the story. She pays the transport. She absorbs the delay. Most cases die at the handoffs, not the decisions.

In January 2024, Kenya said enough. Tens of thousands marched. “We Are Human Beings.” The government established a task force. A Penal Code Amendment Bill reached Parliament in 2026. The movement forced every one of those outcomes.

Dada Collective Network is what sustains the pressure between the moments of crisis. It is the infrastructure the movement needs to win — not just to be visible, but to be impossible to ignore.

The gauntlet: what every survivor navigates alone

Each node below is an institution she must visit in person, retelling her account from scratch. Most cases die between nodes, not at them.

Police Gender DeskOften no officer on duty; gender log not signed without her
OB Number issuedMay be withheld pending P3 — itself a fee barrier
P3 Medical Exam (GVRC)~KES 1,500 charged illegally; limited clinic access
Witness StatementRetelling from scratch; paraphrased on its way to ODPP
ODPP File ReviewReturned for 'more evidence' — meaning: file is incomplete
Magistrate's Court11 courts for 7,000+ GBV cases/year; adjournments are routine
Witness Protection (if applicable)Complex, slow, not automatically triggered
TrialAverage 7+ court appearances for the survivor; evidence lost in transit
SentencingFemicide prosecuted as murder — no gender-specific framework
AppealsYears more. Most survivors do not survive the process.

Governance

Three teams. Three mandates. No single point of capture.

No single team can be simultaneously inside the movement, inside the data, and inside the institutions. That is why three teams share governance — with explicit veto rights that cannot be overridden by any donor or state actor.

Dada Collective Network
Zaha Indimuli
National Coordinator & Advocacy Lead, #EndFemicideKE

Convene survivors, police, prosecutors, courts. Hold the femicide movement together. Steward the app. Hold the survivor experience as the non-negotiable constraint.

Veto: Can veto any feature that increases survivor burden
Silencing Women Project
Patricia Andago
Research and Data Analyst, Odipo Dev

Ten years of pattern recognition. Owns and operates the national GBV/femicide database. Distinguishes structural failures from resource problems — and knows which institutional failures are designed, not accidental.

Veto: Can veto any data practice that risks survivor identification
Heinrich Böll Foundation
Akinyi Odera
Gender Justice Program

Policy advocacy, feminist movement support, institutional relationships, credibility. Sits at exactly the intersection this work requires. Ensures the project is designed around survivor safety first — and that no donor can capture the agenda.

Veto: Can veto any design that compromises survivor safety

What we stand for

Survivor-led, not survivor-centred

Women are not recipients of services here. They guide this process. Every design decision, every feature, every publication is tested against one question: does this treat a woman as a citizen exercising a right, or a petitioner asking for a favour?

Data as accountability, not performance

We publish numbers because named, counted, timestamped data is the only thing that moves institutions. Not because statistics tell the human story — they don't. We use data to create accountability, and stories to create empathy.

Safety above everything

80% of femicides are committed by intimate partners. Any woman using Dada may be doing so while at risk. No identifying information is ever published without explicit, safety-audited consent. The quick-exit button is not optional.

Independent data sovereignty

The Silencing Women Project database is owned by SWP — not by Dada Collective, not by Heinrich Böll Foundation, not by any donor or state body. If SWP dissolves, the database transfers to a survivor-led successor entity. It never reverts to government.

Technology serves justice, not the reverse

The tech team has no veto rights. Technology is one leg of three — and the smallest one. The movement holds convening power. The data team holds accountability. Technology carries what the movement decides must be carried.

Long-termism

This is infrastructure for 20 years, not a project for a funding cycle. Every architectural decision — technical, organisational, legal — is made for scale: 1,000 users → 10,000 → 100,000 → 1 million. Build for where it needs to go, not where it starts.

Partner with Dada Collective Network

Technology development is covered in-kind by Datacraft Limited. We are actively seeking partners for research, operations, community programmes, and the Dada Salama app build. Governance ensures no single funder can direct the agenda.